↓ Skip to main content

Relative velocities for radial motion in expanding Robertson-Walker spacetimes

Overview of attention for article published in General Relativity and Gravitation, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Relative velocities for radial motion in expanding Robertson-Walker spacetimes
Published in
General Relativity and Gravitation, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10714-012-1344-5
Authors

Vicente J. Bolós, David Klein

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 14%
Greece 1 14%
Canada 1 14%
Unknown 4 57%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Researcher 2 29%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 5 71%
Mathematics 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2012.
All research outputs
#21,358,731
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from General Relativity and Gravitation
#1,210
of 1,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,626
of 158,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from General Relativity and Gravitation
#11
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,448 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.