↓ Skip to main content

XVII * New Literatures

Overview of attention for article published in The Year's Work in English Studies, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
XVII * New Literatures
Published in
The Year's Work in English Studies, June 2010
DOI 10.1093/ywes/maq019
Authors

F. Abodunrin, M. N. Chakraborty, L. Dale, E. Hicks, R. J. Lane, I. Raja, T. S. da Silva, P. Sharrad, C. Tiffin, N. Wattie

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 40%
Other 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 60%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2012.
All research outputs
#20,165,369
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from The Year's Work in English Studies
#67
of 73 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,116
of 95,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Year's Work in English Studies
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 73 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them