You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
市民科学による東京のチョウと植物の共生ネットワークモニタリングの可能性
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.18960/hozen.1929 |
| Authors |
海老原 健吾, 安川 雅紀, 永井 美穂子, 喜連川 優, 鷲谷 いづみ |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2020.
All research outputs
#20,739,552
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology
#187
of 200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#395,094
of 519,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Conservation Ecology
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.