↓ Skip to main content

Psychological and Social Characteristics Associated with Religiosity in Women’s Health Initiative Participants

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Religion and Health, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Psychological and Social Characteristics Associated with Religiosity in Women’s Health Initiative Participants
Published in
Journal of Religion and Health, November 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10943-011-9549-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eliezer Schnall, Solomon Kalkstein, George Fitchett, Elena Salmoirago-Blotcher, Judith Ockene, Hilary Aurora Tindle, Asha Thomas, Julie R. Hunt, Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller

Abstract

Measures of religiosity are linked to health outcomes, possibly indicating mediating effects of associated psychological and social factors. We examined cross-sectional data from 92,539 postmenopausal participants of the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study who responded to questions on religious service attendance, psychological characteristics, and social support domains. We present odds ratios from multiple logistic regressions controlling for covariates. Women attending services weekly during the past month, compared with those not attending at all in the past month, were less likely to be depressed [OR = 0.78; CI = 0.74-0.83] or characterized by cynical hostility [OR = 0.94; CI = 0.90-0.98], and more likely to be optimistic [OR = 1.22; CI = 1.17-1.26]. They were also more likely to report overall positive social support [OR = 1.28; CI = 1.24-1.33], as well as social support of four subtypes (emotional/informational support, affection support, tangible support, and positive social interaction), and were less likely to report social strain [OR = 0.91; CI = 0.88-0.94]. However, those attending more or less than weekly were not less likely to be characterized by cynical hostility, nor were they less likely to report social strain, compared to those not attending during the past month.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 7%
Unknown 25 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Professor 3 11%
Lecturer 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Other 6 22%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 15%
Social Sciences 4 15%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 6 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2012.
All research outputs
#21,376,200
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Religion and Health
#1,173
of 1,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,749
of 145,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Religion and Health
#13
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.