↓ Skip to main content

Tea consumption, incidence and long-term prognosis of a first acute myocardial infarction – The SHEEP study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Nutrition, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tea consumption, incidence and long-term prognosis of a first acute myocardial infarction – The SHEEP study
Published in
Clinical Nutrition, November 2011
DOI 10.1016/j.clnu.2011.10.011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ganna Pyshchyta, Kenneth J. Mukamal, Staffan Ahnve, Johan Hallqvist, Katalin Gémes, Anders Ahlbom, Imre Janszky

Abstract

Results of previous studies on tea consumption and incidence or prognosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are conflicting. The aim of the present study was to examine the potential role of tea consumption in the previous 12 months in primary and secondary prevention of AMI.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 22%
Student > Master 3 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Professor 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 39%
Psychology 2 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2012.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Nutrition
#3,331
of 3,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,678
of 155,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Nutrition
#24
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.