↓ Skip to main content

On learning sets and functions

Overview of attention for article published in Machine Learning, October 1989
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
On learning sets and functions
Published in
Machine Learning, October 1989
DOI 10.1007/bf00114804
Authors

B. K. Natarajan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 11%
Switzerland 1 4%
India 1 4%
Italy 1 4%
China 1 4%
Czechia 1 4%
Unknown 20 71%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 14%
Researcher 4 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 21 75%
Engineering 2 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Unknown 4 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,731,085
of 23,500,709 outputs
Outputs from Machine Learning
#293
of 1,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,190
of 14,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Machine Learning
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,500,709 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,008 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them