↓ Skip to main content

CO2, CO, and Hg emissions from the Truman Shepherd and Ruth Mullins coal fires, eastern Kentucky, USA

Overview of attention for article published in Science of the Total Environment, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CO2, CO, and Hg emissions from the Truman Shepherd and Ruth Mullins coal fires, eastern Kentucky, USA
Published in
Science of the Total Environment, January 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.12.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer M.K. O'Keefe, Kevin R. Henke, James C. Hower, Mark A. Engle, Glenn B. Stracher, J.D. Stucker, Jordan W. Drew, Wayne D. Staggs, Tiffany M. Murray, Maxwell L. Hammond, Kenneth D. Adkins, Bailey J. Mullins, Edward W. Lemley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 33%
Researcher 5 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 21%
Environmental Science 6 18%
Chemistry 3 9%
Energy 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 13 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,280,329
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#9,490
of 30,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,073
of 175,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#15
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.