↓ Skip to main content

EULAR/ERA-EDTA recommendations for the management of ANCA-associated vasculitis

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
113 X users
patent
13 patents
facebook
9 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
965 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
898 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
EULAR/ERA-EDTA recommendations for the management of ANCA-associated vasculitis
Published in
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, June 2016
DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209133
Pubmed ID
URN
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-132060
Authors

M Yates, R A Watts, I M Bajema, M C Cid, B Crestani, T Hauser, B Hellmich, J U Holle, M Laudien, M A Little, R A Luqmani, A Mahr, P A Merkel, J Mills, J Mooney, M Segelmark, V Tesar, K Westman, A Vaglio, N Yalçındağ, D R Jayne, C Mukhtyar

Abstract

In this article, the 2009 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) have been updated. The 2009 recommendations were on the management of primary small and medium vessel vasculitis. The 2015 update has been developed by an international task force representing EULAR, the European Renal Association and the European Vasculitis Society (EUVAS). The recommendations are based upon evidence from systematic literature reviews, as well as expert opinion where appropriate. The evidence presented was discussed and summarised by the experts in the course of a consensus-finding and voting process. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendations were derived and levels of agreement (strengths of recommendations) determined. In addition to the voting by the task force members, the relevance of the recommendations was assessed by an online voting survey among members of EUVAS. Fifteen recommendations were developed, covering general aspects, such as attaining remission and the need for shared decision making between clinicians and patients. More specific items relate to starting immunosuppressive therapy in combination with glucocorticoids to induce remission, followed by a period of remission maintenance; for remission induction in life-threatening or organ-threatening AAV, cyclophosphamide and rituximab are considered to have similar efficacy; plasma exchange which is recommended, where licensed, in the setting of rapidly progressive renal failure or severe diffuse pulmonary haemorrhage. These recommendations are intended for use by healthcare professionals, doctors in specialist training, medical students, pharmaceutical industries and drug regulatory organisations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 113 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 898 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 890 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 134 15%
Researcher 125 14%
Student > Postgraduate 97 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 8%
Student > Master 66 7%
Other 213 24%
Unknown 191 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 543 60%
Immunology and Microbiology 23 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 2%
Other 63 7%
Unknown 224 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 175. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#233,849
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#87
of 7,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,601
of 374,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#3
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.