↓ Skip to main content

2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
304 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
502 Mendeley
Title
2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design
Published in
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10840-012-9672-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hugh Calkins, Karl Heinz Kuck, Riccardo Cappato, Josep Brugada, A. John Camm, Shih-Ann Chen, Harry J. G. Crijns, Ralph J. Damiano, D. Wyn Davies, John DiMarco, James Edgerton, Kenneth Ellenbogen, Michael D. Ezekowitz, David E. Haines, Michel Haissaguerre, Gerhard Hindricks, Yoshito Iesaka, Warren Jackman, Jose Jalife, Pierre Jais, Jonathan Kalman, David Keane, Young-Hoon Kim, Paulus Kirchhof, George Klein, Hans Kottkamp, Koichiro Kumagai, Bruce D. Lindsay, Moussa Mansour, Francis E. Marchlinski, Patrick M. McCarthy, J. Lluis Mont, Fred Morady, Koonlawee Nademanee, Hiroshi Nakagawa, Andrea Natale, Stanley Nattel, Douglas L. Packer, Carlo Pappone, Eric Prystowsky, Antonio Raviele, Vivek Reddy, Jeremy N. Ruskin, Richard J. Shemin, Hsuan-Ming Tsao, David Wilber

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 502 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 490 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 90 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 11%
Other 52 10%
Student > Master 52 10%
Student > Bachelor 40 8%
Other 131 26%
Unknown 82 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 274 55%
Engineering 39 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 2%
Social Sciences 8 2%
Other 50 10%
Unknown 105 21%