↓ Skip to main content

Can a professional development workshop with follow-up alter practitioner behaviour and outcomes for neck pain patients? A randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Can a professional development workshop with follow-up alter practitioner behaviour and outcomes for neck pain patients? A randomised controlled trial
Published in
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, June 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.math.2016.06.010
Pubmed ID
Authors

L.S. Chipchase, R. Cavaleri, G. Jull

Abstract

Continuing professional development (CPD) is a fundamental component of physiotherapy practice. Follow-up sessions provide opportunity for the refinement of skills developed during CPD workshops. However, it is necessary to identify if such opportunity translates to improved physiotherapist performance and patient outcomes. To determine whether a traditional CPD workshop with a follow-up session with the educator is more likely to change physiotherapists' practice behaviour and patient outcomes than a traditional workshop with no opportunity for follow-up. A single-blind, randomised controlled trial. Participants were stratified and randomly allocated to the intervention and control groups. The control group participated in a two-day workshop dedicated towards the management of neck disorders. The intervention group completed the two-day workshop and attended a five-hour follow-up session one month later. Outcome measures included self-reported physiotherapist practice behaviour and confidence, as well as patient clinical outcomes using the Neck Disability Index. While all participants exhibited changes in confidence and practice behaviours, between-group differences were not significant for any response (p > 0.05). There were also no significant differences between the groups in terms of patient outcomes (Neck Disability Index: F = 0.36, p = 0.56). A single follow-up session to a traditional workshop is insufficient to significantly influence practice behaviours or patient outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 83 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 23%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 5 6%
Researcher 5 6%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 21 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 22 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 17%
Sports and Recreations 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 24 29%