↓ Skip to main content

Video head impulse test: a review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
144 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
275 Mendeley
Title
Video head impulse test: a review of the literature
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00405-016-4157-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Salman F Alhabib, Issam Saliba

Abstract

Video head impulse test (vHIT) is a new testing which able to identify the overt and covert saccades and study the gain of vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) of each semicircular canal. The aim of this study is to review the clinical use of vHIT in patients with vestibular disorders in different diseases. PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched for all articles that defined vHIT, compared vHIT with another clinical test, and studied the efficacy of vHIT as diagnostic tools with vestibular disease. 37 articles about vHIT were reviewed. All articles studied the vHIT in English and French languages up to May 2015 were included in the review. Editorial articles or short comments, conference abstracts, animal studies, and language restriction were excluded from the review. Four systems were used in the literature to do the vHIT. vHIT is physiological quick test, which studied the VOR at high frequency of each semicircular canal by calculating the duration ratio between the head impulse and gaze deviation. vHIT is more sensitive than clinical head impulse test (cHIT), especially in patient with isolated covert saccades. vHIT test is diagnostic of vestibular weakness by gain reduction and the appearance of overt and covert saccades. If the vHIT is normal, then caloric test is mandatory to rule out a peripheral origin of vertigo. It is recommended to test each semicircular canal, as isolated vertical canal weakness was identified in the literature. More investigation would be required to determine the evolution of the VOR gain with the progression of the vestibular disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 275 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 272 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 19%
Other 27 10%
Student > Postgraduate 25 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 9%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Other 55 20%
Unknown 69 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 122 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 11%
Neuroscience 16 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Engineering 5 2%
Other 11 4%
Unknown 85 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2016.
All research outputs
#22,293,065
of 24,880,704 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#2,253
of 3,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#316,860
of 360,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
#46
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,880,704 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,323 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.