↓ Skip to main content

A synthesis of meta-analytic evidence of behavioral interventions to reduce HIV/STIs

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Behavioral Medicine, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
A synthesis of meta-analytic evidence of behavioral interventions to reduce HIV/STIs
Published in
Journal of Behavioral Medicine, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10865-016-9714-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Judith Covey, Harriet E. S. Rosenthal-Stott, Stephanie J. Howell

Abstract

To identify the mode of delivery, communicator, and content dimensions that make STI/HIV prevention interventions most successful at increasing condom use/protected sex or reducing STI/HIV incidence. A literature search for published meta-analyses of STI/HIV prevention interventions yielded 37 meta-analyses that had statistically tested the moderating effects of the dimensions. Significant and non-significant moderators from the coded dimensions were extracted from each meta-analysis. The most consistently significant moderators included matching the gender or ethnicity of the communicator to the intervention recipients, group targeting or tailoring of the intervention, use of a theory to underpin intervention design, providing factual information, presenting arguments designed to change attitudes, and providing condom skills and intrapersonal skills training. The absence of significant effects for intervention duration and expert delivery are also notable. The success of HIV/STI prevention interventions may be enhanced not only by providing skills training and information designed to change attitudes, but also by ensuring that the content is tailored to the target group and delivered by individuals of the same gender and ethnicity as the recipients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 80 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 20%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 24 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 13 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Psychology 8 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 28 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2017.
All research outputs
#3,077,639
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#220
of 1,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,063
of 396,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#3
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,073 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.