You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
鍼治療後に生じた両側性気胸の1症例
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
KANTO Journal of Japanese Association for Acute Medicine, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.24697/jaamkanto.41.2_271 |
| Authors |
進藤 博俊, 山岸 利暢, 長岡 毅, 坪井 謙, 松本 建志, 守谷 俊 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,347,775
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from KANTO Journal of Japanese Association for Acute Medicine
#5
of 37 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,128
of 383,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from KANTO Journal of Japanese Association for Acute Medicine
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one scored the same or higher as 32 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.