↓ Skip to main content

Soft System Dynamics Methodology (SSDM): Combining Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) and System Dynamics (SD)

Overview of attention for article published in Systemic Practice and Action Research, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 140)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
441 Mendeley
Title
Soft System Dynamics Methodology (SSDM): Combining Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) and System Dynamics (SD)
Published in
Systemic Practice and Action Research, June 2005
DOI 10.1007/s11213-005-4816-7
Authors

Ricardo Rodriguez-Ulloa, Alberto Paucar-Caceres

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 441 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 9 2%
South Africa 8 2%
Germany 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Other 6 1%
Unknown 408 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 100 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 78 18%
Student > Postgraduate 35 8%
Researcher 33 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 7%
Other 78 18%
Unknown 84 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 128 29%
Engineering 64 15%
Computer Science 47 11%
Social Sciences 39 9%
Environmental Science 19 4%
Other 50 11%
Unknown 94 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2021.
All research outputs
#6,838,548
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Systemic Practice and Action Research
#23
of 140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,776
of 58,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systemic Practice and Action Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 140 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them