| Title |
Carbon and nitrogen discrimination factors for elasmobranch soft tissues based on a long-term controlled feeding study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Biology of Fishes, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10641-011-9919-7 |
| Authors |
Sora Lee Kim, Dave R. Casper, Felipe Galván-Magaña, Ruth Ochoa-Díaz, Sandra Berenice Hernández-Aguilar, Paul L. Koch |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 203 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 18% |
| Researcher | 34 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 10% |
| Unknown | 32 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 109 | 53% |
| Environmental Science | 36 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Unknown | 39 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2012.
All research outputs
#20,165,369
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Biology of Fishes
#1,498
of 1,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,765
of 125,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Biology of Fishes
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,759 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.