↓ Skip to main content

Lancet COVID-19 Commission Statement on the occasion of the 75th session of the UN General Assembly

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
58 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
8693 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
391 Mendeley
Title
Lancet COVID-19 Commission Statement on the occasion of the 75th session of the UN General Assembly
Published in
The Lancet, September 2020
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31927-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Task Force Chairs The Lancet COVID-19 Commissioners, Jeffrey D Sachs, Salim Abdool Karim, Lara Aknin, Joseph Allen, Kirsten Brosbøl, Gabriela Cuevas Barron, Peter Daszak, María Fernanda Espinosa, Vitor Gaspar, Alejandro Gaviria, Andy Haines, Peter Hotez, Phoebe Koundouri, Felipe Larraín Bascuñán, Jong-Koo Lee, Muhammad Pate, Paul Polman, Srinath Reddy, Ismail Serageldin, Raj Shah, John Thwaites, Vaira Vike-Freiberga, Chen Wang, Miriam Khamadi Were, Lan Xue, Min Zhu, Chandrika Bahadur, Maria Elena Bottazzi, Yanis Ben Amor, Lauren Barredo, Ozge Karadag Caman, Guillaume Lafortune, Emma Torres, Ismini Ethridge, Juliana G E Bartels

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8,693 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 391 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 391 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 13%
Researcher 32 8%
Student > Bachelor 30 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 6%
Professor 19 5%
Other 80 20%
Unknown 157 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 8%
Social Sciences 24 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 12 3%
Other 81 21%
Unknown 168 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3704. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,443
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#96
of 42,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89
of 429,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#6
of 340 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 340 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.