↓ Skip to main content

Cross-national differences in grip strength among 50+ year-old Europeans: results from the SHARE study

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Ageing, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Cross-national differences in grip strength among 50+ year-old Europeans: results from the SHARE study
Published in
European Journal of Ageing, August 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10433-009-0128-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen Andersen-Ranberg, I. Petersen, H. Frederiksen, J. P. Mackenbach, K. Christensen

Abstract

Grip strength (GS) has an age- and gender-dependent decline with advancing age. One study comparing GS among extremely old show a North-South gradient with lowest GS in Italy compared to France (intermediary) and Denmark (highest) even after adjusting for confounders. As GS is associated with higher rates of functional decline and mortality, and thus may be used as a health indicator, it is of interest to examine whether the results on extremely old can be reproduced in a large-scale European survey. GS was measured in a cross-sectional population-based sample of 27,456 individuals aged 50+ in 11 European countries included in the SHARE survey. We made a cross-country comparison of the age trajectory of GS in both genders. Northern-continental European countries had higher GS than southern European countries even when stratifying by age and gender and controlling for height, weight, education, health and socioeconomic status. The relative excess was found to be 11% and the absolute difference 5.0 kg for 50- to 54-year-old men, increasing to 28% and 6.9 kg among 80+ year-old men. The corresponding figures for women were 16% and 4.3 kg, and 21% and 3.5 kg, respectively. Southern European countries have lower GS in the age range 50+ year. Gene-environment interactions may explain country-specific differences. The use of GS in cross-national surveys should control not only for age and gender, but also for nationality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 82 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 20%
Researcher 17 20%
Student > Master 16 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 26%
Social Sciences 14 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 7%
Sports and Recreations 5 6%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 19 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2023.
All research outputs
#3,766,556
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Ageing
#102
of 374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,235
of 120,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Ageing
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.