↓ Skip to main content

Current Trends in the Management of Phyllodes Tumors of the Breast

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Current Trends in the Management of Phyllodes Tumors of the Breast
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, June 2016
DOI 10.1245/s10434-016-5314-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Taiwo Adesoye, Heather B. Neuman, Lee G. Wilke, Jessica R. Schumacher, Jennifer Steiman, Caprice C. Greenberg

Abstract

National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend wide excision without axillary staging to treat phyllodes tumors of the breast. Without prospective trials to guide management, NCCN also recommends consideration of radiation therapy (XRT). We describe current patterns of care for the multidisciplinary management of phyllodes tumors. Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) data, we identified women diagnosed with phyllodes tumors between 2000 and 2012 who underwent surgical therapy. Trends in breast-conserving surgery (BCS), nodal sampling, and XRT were assessed using the Cochrane-Armitage test. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with treatment. Of 1238 patients, 56.9 % underwent BCS and 23.6 % underwent nodal sampling (10.5 % after BCS vs. 40.9 % after mastectomy). After surgery, 15.4 % received adjuvant XRT (BCS 12.9 %, and mastectomy 18.8 %). XRT utilization increased significantly over the study period (BCS, p = < 0.0001; mastectomy, p = 0.0003), while nodal sampling did not change significantly. Women were more likely to receive mastectomy if they were older or had larger tumors. Nodal sampling was also associated with older age, larger tumor size, and receipt of mastectomy. Receipt of XRT was associated with later year of diagnosis, larger tumors, and nodal assessment. Over time, an increasing number of women received XRT after surgical management of phyllodes tumor, and one in four women underwent nodal sampling. While some of this practice can be attributed to concern about more advanced disease in the absence of strong data, there may be an educational gap regarding current guidelines and appropriate management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Slovenia 1 2%
Unknown 53 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 19%
Student > Postgraduate 7 13%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Lecturer 3 6%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 15 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 16 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2017.
All research outputs
#6,256,466
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#2,073
of 6,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,390
of 352,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#49
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.