↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of a 'Global Postural Reeducation' program for persistent Low Back Pain: a non-randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
368 Mendeley
Title
Effectiveness of a 'Global Postural Reeducation' program for persistent Low Back Pain: a non-randomized controlled trial
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-11-285
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesca Bonetti, Stefania Curti, Stefano Mattioli, Raffaele Mugnai, Carla Vanti, Francesco S Violante, Paolo Pillastrini

Abstract

The aim of this non-randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of a Global Postural Reeducation (GPR) program as compared to a Stabilization Exercise (SE) program in subjects with persistent low back pain (LBP) at short- and mid-term follow-up (ie. 3 and 6 months).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 368 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 354 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 75 20%
Student > Master 59 16%
Student > Postgraduate 25 7%
Researcher 18 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 5%
Other 75 20%
Unknown 98 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 117 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 71 19%
Sports and Recreations 22 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 1%
Other 31 8%
Unknown 112 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2019.
All research outputs
#3,881,484
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#757
of 4,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,985
of 180,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.