↓ Skip to main content

Empirical Evidence on Student-t Log-Returns of Diversified World Stock Indices

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Empirical Evidence on Student-t Log-Returns of Diversified World Stock Indices
Published in
Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice, June 2008
DOI 10.1080/15598608.2008.10411873
Authors

Eckhard Platen, Renata Rendek

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Other 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Unknown 7 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 4 29%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 21%
Mathematics 2 14%
Unknown 5 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2012.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice
#43
of 59 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,069
of 97,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 59 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them