| Title |
Revealing the impact of structural variants in multiple myeloma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Blood Cancer Discovery, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1158/2643-3230.bcd-20-0132 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Even H Rustad, Venkata D Yellapantula, Dominik Glodzik, Kylee H Maclachlan, Benjamin Diamond, Eileen M Boyle, Cody Ashby, Patrick Blaney, Gunes Gundem, Malin Hultcrantz, Daniel Leongamornlert, Nicos Angelopoulos, Luca Agnelli, Daniel Auclair, Yanming Zhang, Ahmet Dogan, Niccolò Bolli, Elli Papaemmanuil, Kenneth C Anderson, Philippe Moreau, Hervé Avet-Loiseau, Nikhil C Munshi, Jonathan J Keats, Peter J Campbell, Gareth J Morgan, Ola Landgren, Francesco Maura |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 46% |
| Norway | 2 | 4% |
| Senegal | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Thailand | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 50% |
| Scientists | 19 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 14% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 23 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 25 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,324,260
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Blood Cancer Discovery
#58
of 212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,688
of 443,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood Cancer Discovery
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.