Title |
Practical experiences in the usage of MIDAS in the logistics domain
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, June 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10009-016-0430-5 |
Authors |
M. A. Barcelona, L. García-Borgoñón, G. López-Nicolás |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 10 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 6 | 30% |
Engineering | 2 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 10 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2016.
All research outputs
#12,842,842
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
#62
of 111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,283
of 352,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 111 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them