↓ Skip to main content

Risk Factors for Hepatitis C Virus Infection Among Homeless Adults

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, March 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Risk Factors for Hepatitis C Virus Infection Among Homeless Adults
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, March 2002
DOI 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10415.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adeline M. Nyamathi, Elizabeth L. Dixon, Wendie Robbins, Cynthia Smith, Dorothy Wiley, Barbara Leake, Douglas Longshore, Lillian Gelberg

Abstract

To describe the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in a sample of homeless and impoverished adults and examine risk factors for HCV infection in the overall sample and as a function of injection drug use. Assays were conducted on stored sera. Sociodemographic characteristics and risky sexual activity were measured by content-specific items. Substance use was measured by a structured questionnaire. HCV antibodies were tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; a confirmatory level was defined by recombinant immunoblot assay. Shelters ( N = 36) and outdoor locations in Los Angeles. Eight hundred eighty-four homeless women and/or partners or friends. Among this sample of 884 homeless and impoverished adults, 22% were found to be HCV infected. Lifetime injection drug users (IDUs) (cocaine, crack, and methamphetamine) and recent daily users of crack were more likely than nonusers or less-frequent users of these drugs to be HCV-infected. Similar results were found for those who had been hospitalized for a mental health problem. Among non-injection drug users and persons in the total sample, those who reported lifetime alcohol abuse were more likely than those who did not to be HCV infected. Controlling for sociodemographic characteristics, multiple logistic regression analyses revealed IDUs have over 25 times greater odds of having HCV infection than non-IDUs. HCV infection was also predicted by older age, having started living on one's own before the age of 18, and recent chronic alcohol use. Males and recent crack users had about one and a half times greater odds of HCV infection when compared to females and non-chronic crack users. Targeted outreach for homeless women and their partners, including HCV testing coupled with referrals to HCV and substance abuse treatments, may be helpful.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Pakistan 1 1%
Unknown 95 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 21 22%
Unknown 24 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 23%
Psychology 12 12%
Social Sciences 9 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 31 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2016.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#6,921
of 8,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,101
of 49,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#61
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.