Title |
Significant association of cadaveric dura mater grafting with subpial Aβ deposition and meningeal amyloid angiopathy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Acta Neuropathologica, June 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00401-016-1588-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tsuyoshi Hamaguchi, Yu Taniguchi, Kenji Sakai, Tetsuyuki Kitamoto, Masaki Takao, Shigeo Murayama, Yasushi Iwasaki, Mari Yoshida, Hiroshi Shimizu, Akiyoshi Kakita, Hitoshi Takahashi, Hiroyoshi Suzuki, Hironobu Naiki, Nobuo Sanjo, Hidehiro Mizusawa, Masahito Yamada |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 18% |
Professor | 8 | 16% |
Researcher | 7 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
Other | 5 | 10% |
Other | 7 | 14% |
Unknown | 9 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 12 | 24% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 16 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2019.
All research outputs
#998,460
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#147
of 2,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,921
of 374,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.