↓ Skip to main content

Hugh Williamson, M.D., LL.D. (1735–1819): Soldier, Surgeon, and Founding Father

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Hugh Williamson, M.D., LL.D. (1735–1819): Soldier, Surgeon, and Founding Father
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, April 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00268-004-2069-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary Jane Kagarise, George F. Sheldon

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,485,442
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#1,504
of 4,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,379
of 58,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.