↓ Skip to main content

Effect of body position on ventilation distribution in preterm infants on continuous positive airway pressure

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of body position on ventilation distribution in preterm infants on continuous positive airway pressure
Published in
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, July 2012
DOI 10.1097/pcc.0b013e31822f18d9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Judith L. Hough, Leanne Johnston, Sandy G. Brauer, Paul G. Woodgate, Trang M. T. Pham, Andreas Schibler

Abstract

Although continuous positive airway pressure is used extensively in neonatal intensive care units, and despite the belief that positioning is considered vital to the maintenance of good lung ventilation, no data exist on regional ventilation distribution in infants on continuous positive airway pressure ventilatory support.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 90 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 16%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 27 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Engineering 4 4%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 29 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2012.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
#3,968
of 4,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,966
of 176,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
#30
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.