Title |
Model selection by LASSO methods in a change-point model
|
---|---|
Published in |
Statistical Papers, November 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00362-012-0482-x |
Authors |
Gabriela Ciuperca |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 4% |
Turkey | 1 | 4% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 25 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 25% |
Unknown | 4 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mathematics | 10 | 36% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
Computer Science | 2 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2014.
All research outputs
#7,485,442
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from Statistical Papers
#15
of 121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,331
of 184,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Statistical Papers
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 121 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them