↓ Skip to main content

Complementary and alternative medicine therapies for chronic pain

Overview of attention for article published in Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
Title
Complementary and alternative medicine therapies for chronic pain
Published in
Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11655-016-2258-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brent A. Bauer, Jon C. Tilburt, Amit Sood, Guang-xi Li, Shi-han Wang

Abstract

Pain afflflicts over 50 million people in the US, with 30.7% US adults suffering with chronic pain. Despite advances in therapies, many patients will continue to deal with ongoing symptoms that are not fully addressed by the best conventional medicine has to offer them. The patients frequently turn to therapies outside the usual purview of conventional medicine (herbs, acupuncture, meditation, etc.) called complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Academic and governmental groups are also starting to incorporate CAM recommendations into chronic pain management strategies. Thus, for any physician who care for patients with chronic pain, having some familiarity with these therapies-including risks and benefits-will be key to helping guide patients in making evidence-based, well informed decisions about whether or not to use such therapies. On the other hand, if a CAM therapy has evidence of both safety and efficacy then not making it available to a patient who is suffering does not meet the need of the patient. We summarize the current evidence of a wide variety of CAM modalities that have potential for helping patients with chronic pain in this article. The triad of chronic pain symptoms, ready access to information on the internet, and growing patient empowerment suggest that CAM therapies will remain a consistent part of the healthcare of patients dealing with chronic pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 168 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 17%
Student > Bachelor 25 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 52 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 18%
Psychology 13 8%
Neuroscience 7 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 59 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2021.
All research outputs
#14,856,117
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine
#272
of 677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,082
of 337,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 677 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.