| Title |
An earliest Givetian “Lilliput Effect” in the Paraná Basin, and the collapse of the Malvinokaffric shelly fauna
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PalZ, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12542-010-0075-8 |
| Authors |
Elvio Pinto Bosetti, Yngve Grahn, Rodrigo Scalise Horodyski, Paula Mendlowicz Mauller, Pierre Breuer, Carolina Zabini |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 36% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 30 | 67% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 8 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2012.
All research outputs
#21,476,880
of 23,975,976 outputs
Outputs from PalZ
#635
of 649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,260
of 96,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PalZ
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,975,976 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.