↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence and intensity of Alaria alata (Goeze, 1792) in water frogs and brown frogs in natural conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Prevalence and intensity of Alaria alata (Goeze, 1792) in water frogs and brown frogs in natural conditions
Published in
Parasitology Research, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00436-015-4680-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cécile Patrelle, Julien Portier, Damien Jouet, Daniel Delorme, Hubert Ferté

Abstract

In the last 15 years, the mesocercariae of Alaria alata have frequently been reported in the wild boar during routine Trichinella inspections made compulsory for the trade of venison meat in Europe. If these studies have focused primarily on mesocercariae isolated from meat, few works have been done so far to understand the circulation of the parasite in natural conditions especially in the intermediate hosts. This study focuses on the second intermediate hosts of this parasite assessing the suitability of two amphibian groups-brown frogs and water frogs sensu lato-for mesocercarial infection on an area where A. alata has already been identified in water snails and wild boars. During this study, both groups showed to be suitable for mesocercarial infection, with high prevalence and parasite burdens. Prevalence was higher in the brown frog group (56.9 versus 11.54 % for water frogs) which would indicate that it is a preferential group for infection on the study area, though reasons for this remain to be investigated. No significant difference among prevalences was observed between tadpoles and frogs. This study, the first focusing on A. alata in these amphibians in Europe, provides further information on circulation of this parasite in natura.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 26%
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Researcher 2 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 21%
Environmental Science 2 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 6 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2016.
All research outputs
#20,334,427
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#2,885
of 3,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,164
of 266,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#83
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,791 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.