Title |
The impact of dietary calcium intake and vitamin D status on the effects of zoledronate
|
---|---|
Published in |
Osteoporosis International, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00198-012-2117-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
S. Bourke, M. J. Bolland, A. Grey, A. M. Horne, D. J. Wattie, S. Wong, G. D. Gamble, I. R Reid |
Abstract |
We investigated whether baseline dietary calcium intake or vitamin D status modified the effects of zoledronate. Neither variable influenced the effect of zoledronate on bone mineral density, bone turnover, or risk of acute phase reaction, suggesting that co-administration of calcium and vitamin D supplements with zoledronate may not always be necessary. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 77 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 14 | 18% |
Researcher | 7 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
Professor | 3 | 4% |
Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 12% |
Unknown | 35 | 45% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 22% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 8 | 10% |
Unknown | 39 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2017.
All research outputs
#6,381,113
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#1,116
of 3,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,802
of 167,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#11
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.