↓ Skip to main content

Four aspects of self-image close to death at home

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health & Well-Being, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Four aspects of self-image close to death at home
Published in
International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health & Well-Being, April 2011
DOI 10.3402/qhw.v6i2.5931
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ida Carlander, Britt-Marie Ternestedt, Eva Sahlberg-Blom, Ingrid Hellström, Jonas Sandberg

Abstract

Living close to death means an inevitable confrontation with one's own existential limitation. In this article, we argue that everyday life close to death embodies an identity work in progress. We used a narrative approach and a holistic-content reading to analyze 12 interviews conducted with three persons close to death. By illuminating the unique stories and identifying patterns among the participants' narratives, we found four themes exemplifying important aspects of the identity work related to everyday life close to death. Two of the themes, named "Inside and outside of me" and "Searching for togetherness," represented the core of the self-image and were framed by the other themes, "My place in space" and "My death and my time." Our findings elucidate the way the individual stories moved between the past, the present, and the future. This study challenges the idea that everyday life close to impending death primarily means limitations. The findings show that the search for meaning, new knowledge, and community can form a part of a conscious and ongoing identity work close to death.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 3%
Unknown 32 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 24%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 15%
Social Sciences 4 12%
Psychology 4 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2011.
All research outputs
#22,905,350
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health & Well-Being
#607
of 791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,915
of 120,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health & Well-Being
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.