↓ Skip to main content

Eliciting reflections on caring theory in elderly caring practice

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health & Well-Being, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Eliciting reflections on caring theory in elderly caring practice
Published in
International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health & Well-Being, August 2011
DOI 10.3402/qhw.v6i3.7296
Pubmed ID
Authors

Albertine Ranheim, Anita Kärner, Carina Berterö

Abstract

Caring theories are the description and conceptualization of the care that is given in caring practise by nurses and other professional caregivers with the aim of verbalizing and communicating caring phenomena. Intermittently, a theory -practice gap is given expression- that theory does not go along with clinical practice in caring.The aim of this study was an investigation into the possible disparity between theory and practice in caring by analysing nurses' lived experience of the understanding of caring theory in practice in the context of municipal elderly care.Hermeneutical phenomenology was the research approach used to explore the lived experience of caring science theories in caring practice from the perspective of 12 nurses working in municipal care for elderly.The findings shows that the nurses Impulsively described their experience of detachment to caring theory, but when describing their caring intentions, the relationship to theory became apparent, and even confirmed their practice. As such, a seedbed exists for caring theory to be reflected on and cultivated in caring praxis. However, as the nurses describe, the caring theory must be sensitive enough for the nursing practitioners to accept.The gap revealed itself on an organisational level, as the nurses' commission in municipal care did not correspond with their caring intention.We believe it is important to seriously consider what we want to achieve as a caring profession. We have to reflect on our responsibility as culture carriers and knowledge developers. We must make the disparate forces of intention and organisation become one intertwining force.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 19%
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Other 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 35%
Social Sciences 9 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Psychology 2 5%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2011.
All research outputs
#22,760,732
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health & Well-Being
#600
of 785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,646
of 134,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health & Well-Being
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.