↓ Skip to main content

Clonal integration and heavy-metal stress: responses of plants with contrasting evolutionary backgrounds

Overview of attention for article published in Evolutionary Ecology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Clonal integration and heavy-metal stress: responses of plants with contrasting evolutionary backgrounds
Published in
Evolutionary Ecology, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10682-016-9840-9
Authors

Michal Gruntman, Clarissa Anders, Anubhav Mohiley, Tanja Laaser, Stephan Clemens, Stephan Höreth, Katja Tielbörger

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 42%
Environmental Science 5 26%
Unknown 6 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2016.
All research outputs
#18,464,797
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from Evolutionary Ecology
#600
of 709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,889
of 338,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evolutionary Ecology
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 709 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.