↓ Skip to main content

Is there a critical lesion site for unilateral spatial neglect? A meta-analysis using activation likelihood estimation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is there a critical lesion site for unilateral spatial neglect? A meta-analysis using activation likelihood estimation
Published in
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00078
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pascal Molenberghs, Martin V. Sale, Jason B. Mattingley

Abstract

The critical lesion site responsible for the syndrome of unilateral spatial neglect has been debated for more than a decade. Here we performed an activation likelihood estimation (ALE) to provide for the first time an objective quantitative index of the consistency of lesion sites across anatomical group studies of spatial neglect. The analysis revealed several distinct regions in which damage has consistently been associated with spatial neglect symptoms. Lesioned clusters were located in several cortical and subcortical regions of the right hemisphere, including the middle and superior temporal gyrus, inferior parietal lobule, intraparietal sulcus, precuneus, middle occipital gyrus, caudate nucleus, and posterior insula, as well as in the white matter pathway corresponding to the posterior part of the superior longitudinal fasciculus. Further analyses suggested that separate lesion sites are associated with impairments in different behavioral tests, such as line bisection and target cancellation. Similarly, specific subcomponents of the heterogeneous neglect syndrome, such as extinction and allocentric and personal neglect, are associated with distinct lesion sites. Future progress in delineating the neuropathological correlates of spatial neglect will depend upon the development of more refined measures of perceptual and cognitive functions than those currently available in the clinical setting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 2%
Italy 2 1%
United States 2 1%
India 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 183 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 17%
Researcher 30 15%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 9%
Other 39 20%
Unknown 35 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 64 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 16%
Neuroscience 29 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 47 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2013.
All research outputs
#13,870,800
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#4,297
of 7,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,722
of 244,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
#183
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.