| Title |
Optimization of hydroxychloroquine dosing scheme based on COVID-19 patients’ characteristics: a review of the literature and simulations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Xenobiotica, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1080/00498254.2020.1824301 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eleni Karatza, George Ismailos, Markos Marangos, Vangelis Karalis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 207 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 46 | 22% |
| Australia | 10 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 3% |
| France | 4 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Morocco | 1 | <1% |
| Qatar | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Unknown | 123 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 196 | 95% |
| Scientists | 5 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 128 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 25% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 3% |
| Librarian | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 70 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 23 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 69 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 163. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2024.
All research outputs
#254,267
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from Xenobiotica
#2
of 1,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,694
of 435,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Xenobiotica
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,290 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them