You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Public Deliberation on South Korean Nuclear Power Plants: How Can Lay Knowledge Resist against Expertise?
|
---|---|
Published in |
EASTS: East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal, November 2020
|
DOI | 10.1215/18752160-8697878 |
Authors |
Sung Hwan Kim, Hyomin Kim, Sungsoo Song |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
Researcher | 1 | 8% |
Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 9 | 75% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 2 | 17% |
Linguistics | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 9 | 75% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,764,821
of 25,658,541 outputs
Outputs from EASTS: East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal
#47
of 487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,098
of 525,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EASTS: East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 487 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 525,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.