↓ Skip to main content

Maternal and Neonatal Outcome After Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: a Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity Surgery, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
Title
Maternal and Neonatal Outcome After Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: a Systematic Review
Published in
Obesity Surgery, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11695-012-0740-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. Vrebosch, S. Bel, G. Vansant, I. Guelinckx, R. Devlieger

Abstract

The number of women of reproductive age undergoing bariatric surgery, including laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), has increased in recent years. The objective of this study was to list both maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies in obese women (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2)) after LAGB and compare them with pregnancies in obese or normal weight women without LAGB. Studies showed a lower incidence of gestational diabetes, pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), pre-eclampsia, caesarean section (CS), macrosomia, and low birth weight babies in post-LAGB pregnancies compared to pregnancies in obese women without LAGB. Gestational weight gain was also lower in post-LAGB pregnancies. However, the incidence of PIH, pre-eclampsia, CS, preterm birth, large for gestational age, spontaneous abortion, and NICU admission was higher in post-LAGB pregnancies than in normal weight pregnancies. In conclusion, LAGB seems to improve pregnancy outcomes in obese women, even when obesity is still present at the onset of pregnancy. However, further research is needed and pregnant women with a gastric band should always be closely monitored by a multidisciplinary team.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Unknown 121 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 24%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Researcher 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 27 22%
Unknown 25 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Psychology 5 4%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 30 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2016.
All research outputs
#2,799,726
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Surgery
#321
of 3,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,474
of 169,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Surgery
#6
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.