↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication for Weight Loss and Type 2 Diabetes: 1-Year Follow-Up

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity Surgery, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy of Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication for Weight Loss and Type 2 Diabetes: 1-Year Follow-Up
Published in
Obesity Surgery, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11695-012-0724-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Osama Taha

Abstract

Laparoscopic greater curvature plication (LGCP) has gained popularity within the last 2 years because it is a restrictive procedure that reduces gastric volume without the need for stomach resection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 22%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Librarian 2 5%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Linguistics 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 11 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2012.
All research outputs
#14,087,875
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Surgery
#1,791
of 3,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,617
of 169,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Surgery
#30
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.