↓ Skip to main content

A review of the generic computer programs ALEX, RAMAS/space and VORTEX for modelling the viability of wildlife metapopulations

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Modelling, October 1995
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A review of the generic computer programs ALEX, RAMAS/space and VORTEX for modelling the viability of wildlife metapopulations
Published in
Ecological Modelling, October 1995
DOI 10.1016/0304-3800(94)00085-v
Authors

D.B. Lindenmayer, M.A. Burgman, H.R. Akçakaya, R.C. Lacy, H.P. Possingham

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 9 4%
United States 6 2%
France 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Israel 2 <1%
Mozambique 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 212 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 91 37%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 15%
Student > Master 21 9%
Professor 17 7%
Other 17 7%
Other 48 20%
Unknown 13 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 126 52%
Environmental Science 71 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 1%
Engineering 3 1%
Other 9 4%
Unknown 23 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2019.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Modelling
#386
of 2,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,086
of 22,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Modelling
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,342 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them