| Title |
The importance of gestural communication: a study of human–dog communication using incongruent information
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Animal Cognition, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10071-016-1010-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Biagio D’Aniello, Anna Scandurra, Alessandra Alterisio, Paola Valsecchi, Emanuela Prato-Previde |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Hungary | 1 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 5% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 71% |
| Scientists | 3 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 15% |
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 29% |
| Psychology | 18 | 18% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 8 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 28 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 267. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#136,785
of 25,597,324 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#47
of 1,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,751
of 369,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#2
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,597,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.