| Title |
Late Positive Potential ERP Responses to Social and Nonsocial Stimuli in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorder
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10803-016-2845-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen D. Benning, Megan Kovac, Alana Campbell, Stephanie Miller, Eleanor K. Hanna, Cara R. Damiano, Antoinette Sabatino-DiCriscio, Lauren Turner-Brown, Noah J. Sasson, Rachel V. Aaron, Jessica Kinard, Gabriel S. Dichter |
| Abstract |
We examined the late positive potential (LPP) event related potential in response to social and nonsocial stimuli from youths 9 to 19 years old with (n = 35) and without (n = 34) ASD. Social stimuli were faces with positive expressions and nonsocial stimuli were related to common restricted interests in ASD (e.g., electronics, vehicles, etc.). The ASD group demonstrated relatively smaller LPP amplitude to social stimuli and relatively larger LPP amplitude to nonsocial stimuli. There were no group differences in subjective ratings of images, and there were no significant correlations between LPP amplitude and ASD symptom severity within the ASD group. LPP results suggest blunted motivational responses to social stimuli and heightened motivational responses to nonsocial stimuli in youth with ASD. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 75% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 132 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 14% |
| Researcher | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Unknown | 32 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 51 | 38% |
| Neuroscience | 16 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Linguistics | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 40 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2016.
All research outputs
#13,818,183
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#3,364
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,898
of 357,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#34
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.