↓ Skip to main content

Psychometric Properties and Normative Data for a Swedish Version of the Modern Health Worries Scale

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Psychometric Properties and Normative Data for a Swedish Version of the Modern Health Worries Scale
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12529-016-9576-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eva Palmquist, Keith J. Petrie, Steven Nordin

Abstract

The modern health worries (MHW) scale was developed to assess individuals' worries about aspects of modernity and technology affecting personal health. The aim of this study was to psychometrically evaluate a Swedish version of the MHW scale and to provide Swedish normative data. Data were collected as part of the Västerbotten Environmental Health Study, which has a random sample of 3406 Swedish adults (18-79 years). The Swedish version of the MHW scale showed excellent internal consistency and satisfactory convergent validity. A four-factor structure consistent with the original version was confirmed. The model showed invariance across age and sex. A slightly positively skewed and platykurtic distribution was found. Normative data for the general population and for combinations of specific age groups (young, middle aged, and elderly) and sex are presented. The psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the MHW scale suggest that use of this instrument is appropriate for assessing worries about modernity in Swedish-speaking and similar populations. The scale now has the advantage of good normative data being available. MHW may hold importance for understanding and predicting the development of functional disorders, such as idiopathic environmental intolerance and other medically unexplained conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 39 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 28%
Student > Master 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Unspecified 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 9 23%
Psychology 9 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 10 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2016.
All research outputs
#18,809,260
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#824
of 919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,371
of 355,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.