↓ Skip to main content

Role of Viruses in the Development of Atopic Disease in Pediatric Patients

Overview of attention for article published in Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Role of Viruses in the Development of Atopic Disease in Pediatric Patients
Published in
Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11882-012-0295-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dorothy S. Cheung, Mitchell H. Grayson

Abstract

The prevalence of atopic diseases continues to rise in modernized countries, without a clear explanation for this increase. One potential cause identified from epidemiologic studies of children is respiratory RNA viral infections leading to development of recurrent wheezing, asthma, and allergic sensitization. We review human epidemiologic data that both support and refute the role of viruses in this process. Exploring recent murine models, we document possible immunologic mechanisms that could translate a viral infection into atopic disease. We further discuss evidence for a post-viral "atopic cycle" that could explain the development of multiple allergen sensitization, and we explore available data to suggest a connection between viral infections of the gastrointestinal tract with the development of food allergy. Taken together, this review documents evidence to support the "viral hypothesis", and, in particular, the role of RNA viruses in the development of atopic disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 5%
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 34 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 19%
Other 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 9 24%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 43%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Engineering 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 8 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2012.
All research outputs
#20,165,369
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
#734
of 803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,475
of 169,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
#25
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.