Title |
History and Data Analyses of ‘Cutting Out’ Method for Cocoa Swollen Shoot Virus Disease (CSSVD) Control in Ghana
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, March 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf03356553 |
Authors |
George A Ameyaw, Henry K Dzahini-Obiatey, Owusu Domfeh, Francis K Oppong, Kwaku Abaka-Ewusie |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 23% |
Student > Master | 7 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 12 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 23% |
Engineering | 4 | 10% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 8% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 16 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,008,573
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection
#5
of 142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,130
of 300,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.