You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Still bleeding: The variegated geographies of austerity and food banking in rural England and Wales
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Rural Studies, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.024 |
| Authors |
Jon May, Andrew Williams, Paul Cloke, Liev Cherry |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 23 | 56% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 78% |
| Scientists | 5 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
| Researcher | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 28 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 16 | 23% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2022.
All research outputs
#620,648
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Rural Studies
#25
of 1,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,949
of 432,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Rural Studies
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.