↓ Skip to main content

Got the Travel Bug? A Review of Common Infections, Infestations, Bites, and Stings Among Returning Travelers

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Got the Travel Bug? A Review of Common Infections, Infestations, Bites, and Stings Among Returning Travelers
Published in
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40257-016-0203-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew P. Vasievich, Jose Dario Martinez Villarreal, Kenneth J. Tomecki

Abstract

The popularity of international travel continues to increase among Americans, even though they often experience subsequent illness on return from their journey. The pathogens responsible are not necessarily endemic to the destination itself but are often the result of poor sanitary conditions or activities engaged in while away. Skin disease ranks third among all medical concerns in returning travelers. This review addresses the pathogenesis, epidemiology, clinical presentation, and treatment of the most common skin diseases in returning travelers: insect bites and bedbugs, cutaneous larva migrans, scabies, tungiasis, myiasis, leishmaniasis, viral exanthems, and marine envenomation. Primary care physicians and dermatologists should be familiar with these illnesses and a general approach to their evaluation and management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Student > Postgraduate 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 17 25%
Unknown 12 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Unspecified 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 14 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2016.
All research outputs
#6,758,424
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
#450
of 980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,477
of 352,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
#10
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 980 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.