↓ Skip to main content

CT-based automated planning of acetabular cup for total hip arthroplasty (THA) based on hybrid use of two statistical atlases

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
CT-based automated planning of acetabular cup for total hip arthroplasty (THA) based on hybrid use of two statistical atlases
Published in
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11548-016-1428-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoshiyuki Kagiyama, Itaru Otomaru, Masaki Takao, Nobuhiko Sugano, Masahiko Nakamoto, Futoshi Yokota, Noriyuki Tomiyama, Yukio Tada, Yoshinobu Sato

Abstract

This study describes the use of CT images in atlas-based automated planning methods for acetabular cup implants in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The objective of this study is to develop an automated cup planning method considering the statistical distribution of the residual thickness. From a number of past THA planning datasets, we construct two statistical atlases that represent the surgeon's expertise. The first atlas is a pelvis-cup merged statistical shape model (PC-SSM), which encodes global spatial relationships between the patient anatomy and implant. The other is a statistical residual thickness map (SRTM) of the implant surface, which encodes local spatial constraints of the anatomy and implant. In addition to PC-SSM and SRTM, we utilized the minimum thickness as a threshold constraint to prevent penetration. The proposed method was applied to the pelvis shapes segmented from CT images of 37 datasets of osteoarthritis patients. Automated planning results with manual segmentation were compared to the plans prepared by an experienced surgeon. There was no significant difference in the average cup size error between the two methods (1.1 and 1.2 mm, respectively). The average positional error obtained by the proposed method, which integrates the two atlases, was significantly smaller (3.2 mm) than the previous method, which uses single atlas (3.9 mm). In the proposed method with automated segmentation, the size error of the proposed method for automated segmentation was comparable (1.1 mm) to that for manual segmentation (1.1 mm). The average positional error was significantly worse (4.2 mm) than that using manual segmentation (3.2 mm). If we only consider mildly diseased cases, however, there was no significance between them (3.2 mm in automated and 2.6 mm in manual segmentation). We infer that integrating PC-SSM and SRTM is a useful approach for modeling experienced surgeon's preference during cup planning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 23%
Researcher 4 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Professor 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 6 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 32%
Computer Science 3 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Engineering 2 9%
Materials Science 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2016.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#582
of 964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,709
of 367,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#14
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 964 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.