↓ Skip to main content

EVER2 Deficiency is Associated with Mild T-cell Abnormalities

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Immunology, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
EVER2 Deficiency is Associated with Mild T-cell Abnormalities
Published in
Journal of Clinical Immunology, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10875-012-9749-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amandine Crequer, Capucine Picard, Vincent Pedergnana, Annick Lim, Shen-Ying Zhang, Laurent Abel, Slawomir Majewski, Jean-Laurent Casanova, Stefania Jablonska, Gerard Orth, Emmanuelle Jouanguy

Abstract

Epidermodysplasia verruciformis (EV) is a rare genodermatosis characterized by persistent flat warts or pityriasis versicolor-like lesions caused by betapapillomaviruses (EV-HPVs). Autosomal recessive EVER1 and EVER2 deficiencies account for EV in most patients. The mechanisms by which mutations in these partners of the Zinc transporter ZnT1 impair host defense against EV-HPVs are still poorly understood. Keratinocytes of EVER-deficient patients display an alteration of zinc homeostasis and an enhanced proliferative activity. Since EVER proteins are highly expressed in T lymphocytes, we aimed to assess the impact of EVER2 deficiency on T-cell development and function. We studied circulating lymphocyte populations in three adult EV patients sharing the same EVER2 mutation (T150fsX3). We found a normal count of CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells and a normal proliferative capacity in response to anti-CD3 stimulation. However, we observed a significant increase of memory CD4(+) and effector memory CD8(+) T cells, a bias of the TCR Vαβ and Vγδ repertoires and an increase of skin-homing CD4(+) T-cell subsets. Our findings suggest that EVER2-deficient patients display mild T-cell abnormalities. It remains unclear whether these abnormalities result from EVER deficiency, chronic EV-HPV infection, or both.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 29%
Student > Bachelor 4 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 2 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 33%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 10%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2012.
All research outputs
#20,165,369
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Immunology
#1,250
of 1,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,542
of 169,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Immunology
#31
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,556 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.