| Title |
Leverage points for sustainability transformation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David J. Abson, Joern Fischer, Julia Leventon, Jens Newig, Thomas Schomerus, Ulli Vilsmaier, Henrik von Wehrden, Paivi Abernethy, Christopher D. Ives, Nicolas W. Jager, Daniel J. Lang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 17% |
| Australia | 3 | 10% |
| United States | 3 | 10% |
| Sweden | 3 | 10% |
| Germany | 2 | 7% |
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 15 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 14 | 47% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,870 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| Sweden | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1858 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 315 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 304 | 16% |
| Researcher | 253 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 115 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 69 | 4% |
| Other | 232 | 12% |
| Unknown | 582 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 418 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 244 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 130 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 83 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 47 | 3% |
| Other | 269 | 14% |
| Unknown | 679 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2024.
All research outputs
#550,816
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#62
of 1,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,866
of 371,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.